Newsletter | Volume 1

Issue I
Issue II
Issue III
Issue IV
Issue V
Issue VI
Issue VII
Issue VIII
Issue IX
Issue X
Issue XI
Issue XII
Issue XIII
Issue XIV
Issue XV
Issue XVI

click here to

Subscribe to our newsletter



To Unsubscribe click here

Corporate Governance Liability Reforms Post The Credit And Financial Crisis

This case is based on recommendations on Corporate Governance is aimed primarily at companies whose shares are admitted to trading on a regulated market. The objective is that the recommendations are also appropriate for all companies to comply with laws, mandates and principles of good governance to create value.

"Based on the existing information provided to the Court is convinced that the seven accused members of the board have acted gross negligently when reporting the results of the Bank. To this respect it should be emphasized that they in spite of the world crises at hand, that had led to significant falls in the value of stocks and shares and brought many trading and industrial companies in a very difficult situation, neither during the time before the reporting of the results nor by the time of the reporting itself did anything of real importance in order to bring clarity to the true position of the bank and to the extent they tried to, they were satisfied with the explanations given by those directors, that with their incompetent management had contributed to the challenging position of the bank."

The above could be a fictive court ruling but may very well affect your company, the board, management or the statutory auditors.

Recommendations on corporate governance;
  • The recommendations are based on, and supplement, company law and stock exchange regulation, and such rules and regulations are presumed known.
  • The recommendations or parts hereof may provide inspiration for non-publicly traded companies. For example state-owned companies, other companies of particular public interest and certain companies owned by funds.
  • The recommendations enable the individual company to organize its governance optimally in accordance with the 'comply or explain' principle. Thus, non-compliance is not inconsistent with the spirit of the recommendations, but merely a result of the fact that the company has chosen a different approach.

The above is an example and could quite as well be valid for any company as presented at the 8th annual European GRC summit by prof Lars Bo Langsted from Aalborg University, a leading European authority on Board of Director's liabilities and responsibilities and Auditors responsibilities and liabilities.